Maybe Kyoto isn't the must-see it's made out to be...

Skip Kyoto? Wait a minute... That sounds more than a little bit crazy.
Yes, it's the Golden Route for a reason. But have you stopped to think that maybe that reason is exactly why skipping it isn't so crazy after all.
A Popular Question
Like many first timers we assumed we would do the golden route + we have an overnight ryokan booked in Hakone. However the more I see and read online, Kyoto is looking miserable with over tourism. I know it's the golden route for a reason, but is there anyone that thinks we should actually just skip Osaka/kyoto/nara leg and choose somewhere totally different?
While in that area I was def keen on Nara day trip, possibly the hozugawa river boat ride and also the arashiyama monkeys. (Wouldn't bother with the bamboo grove) Had a friend who went last week and said even the monkey park was packed with tourists shoving cameras in the monkey faces.
Do I a) suck up the overcrowding whilst recognising I'm contributing to the problem because it's worth it or b) go somewhere totally different and realise FOMO is stupid.
- A Reddit user asking for advice on reddit
Is Kyoto Worth It?
It's the Golden Route for a reason. But not just one reason.
First, geography made it a populated capital, which led to the most traveled routes (for centuries) heading toward it. This led to the most convenient transportation, and its cultural and historical relevance snowballed.
This of course led to more tourists in modern times coming for the history and also the convenience. This leads to more people recommending it, and more tourists of course leads to more services catering to tourists, which leads to even easier access, and so on.
Kyoto and the Golden Route is the easiest place to ensure a not-disappointing trip, and for tour providers and travel writers to use, because it has such an abundance of easy content.
Many of the things that make it a "must-see" also exist elsewhere, but it's not as easy, and not as concentrated. It is important to take that momentum into account when considering if it is really the "must see" or just the easiest "must see".
The Role of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out)

FOMO is the other huge factor. Despite everyone claiming to dislike touristy places:
- Friends recommend it - "You can't miss it!"
- People go there because of FOMO.
- If they go to Kyoto, or stay on the Golden Route, they miss other places where they would have had a great time.
- Of course they have a great time anyway. And with nothing to compare it to - not knowing what they did miss, they will re-recommend it to others.
But great doesn't automatically mean best. Especially if you never saw what else was out there.
Psychology plays a role here too. We naturally want to feel like we made the right choice. Regardless of where or what, even if an experience would be rated a 5, we all tend to rate things as a 9 or better than it was. After all, we invested time and money into that instead of something else.
We want to feel that we made the right choice. We like to note the positives rather than go away disappointed feeling that "I should have gone somewhere else."
And if everyone else is going there too? Well, then no matter the outcome, it wasn't a dumb choice. It was logical, based on popular opinion. How could so many people be wrong?
My Personal Take
Kyoto is a fun place, and fascinating - especially if you are interested in and can put historical context around what you are seeing.
When I have friends visit Japan, I go to Kyoto - not for what I think are the most fascinating parts (because most are not into Japanese history) - but mostly to ensure no FOMO. I don't want to be responsible for them feeling bad when someone back home - who has only visited Kyoto and the Golden Route - tells them they missed out.
But if people tell me they are OK without going there, I have zero reservations recommending they explore the countryside instead - our custom rural itineraries are a good place to start.
Of course, my experience with travelers is biased. I meet mostly people who chose to go other places. So they also are naturally predisposed to think that they made the best choice.
However, I find that when people go to Kyoto after time in less-touristed areas, they often rank Kyoto lower.
A Typical Pattern I See
- Kyoto first, then countryside: "Kyoto was really cool." (Everything was new, and there was nothing to compare it to.)
- Countryside first, then Kyoto: "Could/should have spent less time in Kyoto. Just needed to go see what it was like." (Saw a lot of the same or similar things in other places, but less crowded. Kyoto's uniqueness felt less than expected.)
- Skipped Kyoto entirely: Usually no regrets because the alternative was fun too. But sometimes a small, lingering: "Maybe we should have at least looked at it."
What Should You Do?
In the end, only you can decide what would be good for your family.
Ask yourself:
- What would they enjoy more?
- If Kyoto wasn't so well-known, would you miss it?
- Is there anything specific about Kyoto you've dreamt of seeing?
- If it didn't exist, would your trip be ruined?
- Do the kids have any special concept of Kyoto or something they're excited about?
- Would they rather see a lot of temples, or explore a quieter place where you don't hear English/German/Chinese all around - but might have more downtime?
Final Thought
Some people come specifically for Kyoto. Others come for Japan, and Kyoto just happens to be the default "must-see." Some travelers even avoid the entire Golden Route - see Why Are People Avoiding the Golden Route? for more on that discussion.
The most important part?
Whatever you decide, focus on enjoying that - not the thing you skipped.
Kyoto is great - even if it could, depending on the perspective, be considered overrated. It's hard not to enjoy it.
If you go, you'll surely enjoy it - even if it's crowded. Same for most places.
It mostly depends on your expectations and attitude.
What Others Redditors Say: Should You Skip Kyoto?
Many travelers wrestle with whether Kyoto is worth the crowds - but the overwhelming sentiment in this thread is: don't skip it, just plan wisely.
- Kyoto is still magical for many - described as relaxing, rich with history, and home to hidden gems beyond the crowded hot spots.
- Crowds are real, especially at major sites like Fushimi Inari or Kiyomizudera. But timing (early morning, late evening, rainy days, or weekdays) makes a big difference.
- Most agree: it's the "Golden Route" for a reason. Even kids often love it. Many locals and tourists say the city's quieter areas or lesser-known temples are just as beautiful and crowd-free.
- Some travelers prefer Osaka or Nara, and a few found Kyoto underwhelming after visiting other regions first - but even those who questioned it said they still enjoyed it.
- Alternatives like Uji, Ohara, or less-visited parts of Kyoto are often recommended for a calmer, still-authentic experience.
- Summary sentiment: If you go with realistic expectations and avoid peak spots/times, Kyoto is very rewarding.
"Kyoto is great… even if it could, depending on perspective, be considered overrated. It is hard not to enjoy it. It mostly depends on your expectations and attitude."